methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Design Charrette with its method-specific working model.
Innovation
Design Charrette
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration of Starbursting with its method-specific working model.
Innovation
Starbursting
Paper illustration for Design Studio
UX Design
Design Studio
Purposedifferent
In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.Helps clarify ideas, open questions, and testable next steps in concrete terms. It opens the thinking space, collects ideas, and leads to testable options. The result is captured as a star-shaped question map, question list, and assumption list.When several designs need to be quickly put in relation to each other, it makes ideas visible and comparable. It encourages early variants instead of long upfront debates.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
Halber Tag bis mehrere Tage10-20 min daily30-60 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
10-5013-103-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Sketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized DirectionDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesStar-Shaped Question Map, Question List, Assumption ListSketches, Concept Directions, Design Decisions
Tagsno overlap
BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
BrainstormingIdeationWorkshopDiscovery
SketchingCollaborationIdeation
Add more methods