View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Delphi Method |  Agile Start Stop Continue |  Product Strategy DIBB |  Agile Starfish Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 30-60 min | 1-2 h | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 6-30 Experten | 3-12 | 2-8 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Starfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments |
Tagsno overlap | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam |