View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Delphi Method | ![]() Agile Sprint Retrospective | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB | ![]() Operations After-Action Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. | When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | Up to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter | 1-2 h | 20-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 6-30 Experten | Scrum Team | 2-8 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes | Improvement actions, Team agreements | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Lessons learned, Action items, Event summary |
Tagsno overlap | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy | RetrospectiveImprovementLearning | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | LearningOperationsImprovement |



