View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Delphi Method |  Agile Sailboat Retrospective |  Decision Making Force Field Analysis |  Agile Start Stop Continue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. | When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture. | In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 6-30 Experten | 4-12 | 3-12 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes | Sailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions | Force Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy | RetrospectiveTeamImprovement | ChangeDecisionStrategy | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection |