methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Anonymous individual judgments pass through feedback loops to form a distribution.
Decision Making
Delphi Method
Paper illustration for NoEstimates.
Agile
NoEstimates
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Paper illustration of MVP Test Matrix with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
MVP Test Matrix
Purposedifferent
When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together.When estimating slows a team down more than it helps, it shifts the focus to flow, small slices, and real lead time. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Throughput Data, Flow Forecast, and Slicing Rules.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-4 Wochenlaufend1-5 Tage45-75 min
Participantsdifferent
6-30 Experten2-12Nutzertraffic2-8
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption NotesThroughput Data, Flow Forecast, Slicing RulesClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning DecisionTest Matrix, Test Plan
Tagsno overlap
ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy
EstimationForecastingFlow
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions
Add more methods