View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Delphi Method |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  Decision Making Assumption Surfacing |  Agile Example Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 20-40 min pro Story | 45-90 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 6-30 Experten | 3-6 | 2-8 | 3-7 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement |