View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |  UX Research User Interviews |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 30-60 min je Interview | 30–60 min per interview | 30-60 min je Interview |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 5-12 Interviews | 1 participant per interview | 5-12 Interviews |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments |
Tagsno overlap | AutonomyRolesTeam | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation |