methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Delegation Poker.
Facilitation
Delegation Poker
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration of Scatter Diagram with its method-specific working model.
Operations
Scatter Diagram
Paper illustration for Fault Tree Analysis.
Operations
Fault Tree Analysis
Purposedifferent
When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.When the question is whether two measures are related, the method makes patterns in the data picture visible. It separates felt correlations from relationships that actually show up in the data.For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowHigh
Timedifferent
45-90 min2-6 h30-90 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
3-103-101-43-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role AgreementsFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsScatter Plot, Korrelationsnotiz, HypothesenlisteFault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions
Tagsno overlap
AutonomyRolesTeam
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
Root causeQualityVisualization
RiskRoot causeSafety
Add more methods