View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |  Decision Making Delphi Method |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-4 Wochen | 45-90 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 6-30 Experten | 3-10 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | AutonomyRolesTeam | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |