methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Delegation Poker.
Facilitation
Delegation Poker
Anonymous individual judgments pass through feedback loops to form a distribution.
Decision Making
Delphi Method
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration for DACI
Decision Making
DACI
Purposedifferent
When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice.When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min1-4 Wochen45–75 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-106-30 ExpertenTeam members involved2-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role AgreementsExpert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsDACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log
Tagsno overlap
AutonomyRolesTeam
ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment
Add more methods