methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Delegation Poker.
Facilitation
Delegation Poker
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Paper illustration for DACI
Decision Making
DACI
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Purposedifferent
When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice.In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min90-180 min30-60 min20-45 min
Participantsdifferent
3-104-122-101-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role AgreementsDecision Rights Matrix, AgreementDACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision LogOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes
Tagsno overlap
AutonomyRolesTeam
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
Add more methods