View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |  Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Facilitation Mind Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-2 h | 45-90 min | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 1-8 | 3-10 | 1-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | AutonomyRolesTeam | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation |