methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Delegation Poker.
Facilitation
Delegation Poker
Paper illustration for Causal Factor Analysis.
Operations
Causal Factor Analysis
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Purposedifferent
When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice.For an event with a complicated course, the method breaks down the contributing factors along the timeline. It shows how conditions, decisions, and reactions together produce a course of events.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowHigh
Timedifferent
45-90 min2-6 h45-90 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
3-103-103-103-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role AgreementsEvent Timeline, Causal Factor Chart, Cause List, Corrective ActionsResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas
Tagsno overlap
AutonomyRolesTeam
CausalityIncidentRoot causeTimeline
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
Add more methods