methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Paper illustration for Time Blocking
Operations
Time Blocking
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Purposedifferent
For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.With a calendar that grows on request, the method makes available time explicit again. It combines appointments, focus work, and buffer into a more realistic day structure.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
30-90 min15-30 min Planung, laufend60-90 min10-20 min daily
Participantsdifferent
1-614-101
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Decision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListBlocked Calendar, Capacity View, Focus PlanProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, ExperimentDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes
Tagsno overlap
DecisionTreeOptions
PlanningTime managementFocus
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Add more methods