methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Paper illustration for Kepner-Tregoe
Operations
Kepner-Tregoe
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.For a disturbance that's hard to pin down, the method cleanly separates problem, cause, and decision. It reduces mixing when symptoms allow several interpretations.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighLowLow
Timedifferent
30-90 min2-8 h10-20 min daily15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
1-62-812-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Decision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListProblem Analysis, Decision Analysis, Risk PlanDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
DecisionTreeOptions
Problem solvingRoot causeDecisionOperations
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods