methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Paper illustration of DIBB with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
DIBB
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
Paper illustration for TOWS Matrix.
Business Strategy
TOWS Matrix
Purposedifferent
For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report.GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.The TOWS Matrix connects internal strengths and weaknesses with external opportunities and threats into action-oriented strategies. It goes a step further than a pure stocktaking.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
30-90 min1-2 h1-3 h1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
1-62-82-83-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Decision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListDIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning reportGap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk NotesTOWS Matrix, Strategic Options, Priority Actions
Tagsno overlap
DecisionTreeOptions
StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
StrategyAnalysisOptions
Add more methods