methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
A paper-based illustration representing C4 Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
C4 Model
A hypothetical failure makes concrete risks, signals, and fitting mitigations visible.
Decision Making
Pre-Mortem
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Purposedifferent
For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes.In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
30-90 min1-4 h20–45 min1-2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1-61-5Small cross-functional group1-4
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Decision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListContext Diagram, Container Diagram, Component DiagramRisk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption logArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View
Tagsno overlap
DecisionTreeOptions
ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization
RiskDecisionFailurePlanning
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
Add more methods