methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Paper illustration of an assumption matrix with prioritized test cards
Decision Making
Assumption Surfacing
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration of DIBB with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
DIBB
Purposedifferent
For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
30-90 min45-90 min10-20 min daily1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
1-62-812-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Decision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListAssumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning PlanDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesDIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report
Tagsno overlap
DecisionTreeOptions
AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis
Add more methods