methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Paper illustration for 1-2-4-All.
Facilitation
1-2-4-All
Paper illustration for Reverse Brainstorming
Innovation
Reverse Brainstorming
Paper illustration of the Lotus Blossom working structure.
Innovation
Lotus Blossom
Purposedifferent
For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster.For persistent errors or blockages, the method shifts the view to the opposite of the desired effect. It exposes the mechanics of failure and makes hidden causes easier to grasp. This makes improvement more concrete and the problem clearer.When a central question feels too large, the method breaks it into neighboring topic fields with their own depth of ideation. It holds structure and openness at the same time, so adjacent perspectives don't get lost. This grows an idea space out of a core problem.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
30-90 min10-20 min30-60 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
1-64-100+3-123-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Decision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListIdea List, Shared Insights, Emergent ThemesReverse Ideas, Risk Themes, Solution IdeasLotus Diagram, Idea Themes, Shortlist
Tagsno overlap
DecisionTreeOptions
FacilitationInclusionIdeation
BrainstormingIdeationCreativityRisk
BrainstormingIdeationCreativityDivergenceWorkshop
Add more methods