View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |  Innovation TRIZ |  Innovation SCAMPER |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | For technical contradictions or trade-offs, the method looks for solutions that resolve opposing requirements at the same time. It translates limits into an explicit picture of conflict that becomes workable. This produces not just compromises but more elegant principles. | For an existing solution under pressure to change, the method deliberately opens space for systematic variants. It directs attention to rebuilding, combining, and repurposing rather than only new basic ideas. This produces concrete evolution paths for products, offerings, or workflows. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 1-4 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 2-8 | 2-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | Contradiction Statement, Inventive Principles, Solution Concepts | SCAMPER Idea List, Concept Shortlist, Variation Notes |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | InnovationProblem solvingContradictionsCreativity | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityReframingInnovation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
