methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Paper illustration for Team Charter.
Facilitation
Team Charter
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Purposedifferent
In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
90-180 min2-4 h15-45 min20-45 min
Participantsdifferent
4-123-121-31-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Decision Rights Matrix, AgreementTeam Charter, Working Norms, Role NotesADR File, Decision Log, RationaleOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes
Tagsno overlap
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
TeamAlignmentCollaboration
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
Add more methods