View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |  Team Design Team API |  Architecture arc42 |  Operations Accountability Ladder |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. | With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | Half day initial, dann laufend | 1-2 Tage | 20-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 1-4 | 1-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | Team API Document | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View | Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication | ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam |