View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |  Agile Specification by Example |  Decision Making RAPID |  Agile Example Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 60-90 min pro Feature | 45-90 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 3-6 | 3-12 | 3-7 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | RAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision Log | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | DecisionRolesGovernance | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement |