methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Paper illustration for Sailboat Retrospective
Agile
Sailboat Retrospective
Paper illustration for DACI
Decision Making
DACI
Paper illustration for Starfish Retrospective
Agile
Starfish Retrospective
Purposedifferent
In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture.In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated.When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
90-180 min45-90 min30-60 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
4-124-122-104-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Decision Rights Matrix, AgreementSailboat Board, Risks, Improvement ActionsDACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision LogStarfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments
Tagsno overlap
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
RetrospectiveTeamImprovement
DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment
RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam
Add more methods