methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Paper board with the four ROAM fields Resolved, Owned, Accepted, and Mitigated.
Agile
ROAM Board
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
90-180 min30 min Setup, dann laufend20-40 min initial, dann laufend1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
4-121-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone3-154-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Decision Rights Matrix, AgreementRAID Log, Status Report SourceROAM Board, Owner ListAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
RiskAgileTrackingAlignment
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods