methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
A hypothetical failure makes concrete risks, signals, and fitting mitigations visible.
Decision Making
Pre-Mortem
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Purposedifferent
In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
90-180 min20–45 min1-2 h30 min Setup, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
4-12Small cross-functional group4-121-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Decision Rights Matrix, AgreementRisk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption logAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsRAID Log, Status Report Source
Tagsno overlap
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
RiskDecisionFailurePlanning
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
Add more methods