View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |  Systems Thinking Leverage Points |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Decision Making Force Field Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | Half day | 60-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 3-12 | 3-6 | 3-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | Leverage Map, Action Strategy | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | Force Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | Systems thinkingChangeStrategy | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | ChangeDecisionStrategy |