View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Decision Rights MappingICE ScoringArchitecture Decision RecordArchitecture Inception Canvas
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping | ![]() Product Strategy ICE Scoring | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Architecture Architecture Inception Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 30-60 min | 15-45 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 2-8 | 1-3 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | ICE Table, Top Idea List | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Inception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | AlignmentArchitectureCanvas |



