methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Architecture Inception Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Architecture Inception Canvas
Purposedifferent
In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
90-180 min1-3 h15-45 min1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
4-122-81-33-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Decision Rights Matrix, AgreementIssue Map, Positions, Argument NotesADR File, Decision Log, RationaleInception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open Questions
Tagsno overlap
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
AlignmentArchitectureCanvas
Add more methods