methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Funnel Analysis workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
Funnel Analysis
Paper illustration of Hooked Model with its method-specific working model.
Growth
Hooked Model
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Purposedifferent
In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses.The Hooked Model helps clarify engagement loops, user behavior, and experiments. It makes repeat behavior measurable and captures the result as a hooked loop, trigger map, and reward design.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumHigh
Timedifferent
90-180 min1-3 hMultiple workshops over several weeks1-4 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
4-121-52-81-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Decision Rights Matrix, AgreementFunnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypothesesHooked loop, Trigger map, Reward design, Ethics checkExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summary
Tagsno overlap
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
AnalyticsConversionGrowth
GrowthBehaviorRetention
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
Add more methods