methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Paper illustration for Delegation Poker.
Facilitation
Delegation Poker
Paper illustration for RAPID
Decision Making
RAPID
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Purposedifferent
In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice.In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
90-180 min45-90 min45-90 min20-45 min
Participantsdifferent
4-123-103-121-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Decision Rights Matrix, AgreementDelegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role AgreementsRAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision LogOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes
Tagsno overlap
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
AutonomyRolesTeam
DecisionRolesGovernance
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
Add more methods