View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping | ![]() Decision Making DACI | ![]() Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes | ![]() Facilitation Responsibility Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated. | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 30-60 min | Half day | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 2-10 | Team-Leads plus Architecture | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | DACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation |



