View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |  Innovation Design Sprint |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 1-3 h | 4-5 Tage | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 1-8 | 5-8 | 1-3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | SensemakingDecisionRationale | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance |