methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration of Stakeholder Salience Model with its method-specific working model.
Facilitation
Stakeholder Salience Model
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Purposedifferent
In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy.When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
90-180 min20-45 min60-90 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
4-121-83-63-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Decision Rights Matrix, AgreementOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesSalience Diagram, Strategy per ClassExpectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements
Tagsno overlap
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
Add more methods