methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Purposedifferent
In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
90-180 min20-45 min1-2 TageHalf day initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
4-121-81-4Ein Team plus Stakeholder
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Decision Rights Matrix, AgreementOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewTeam API Document
Tagsno overlap
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
Add more methods