methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Surveys method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
Surveys
Paper illustration for DACI
Decision Making
DACI
Paper illustration of Stakeholder Salience Model with its method-specific working model.
Facilitation
Stakeholder Salience Model
Purposedifferent
When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal.In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated.When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
60-90 min3-14 Tage30-60 min60-90 min
Participantsdifferent
4-1050+2-103-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Problem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, ExperimentSurvey Results, Charts, Segment InsightsDACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision LogSalience Diagram, Strategy per Class
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
QuantitativeResearchValidation
DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment
StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance
Add more methods