methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Stakeholder Mapping
Facilitation
Stakeholder Mapping
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Purposedifferent
When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
60-90 min60–90 min1-5 Tage1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
4-102-8Nutzertraffic5-30
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Problem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, ExperimentStakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk NotesInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
Add more methods