methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Paper illustration for Hypothesis-Driven Troubleshooting.
Engineering
Hypothesis-Driven Troubleshooting
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Paper illustration for Fault Isolation.
Engineering
Fault Isolation
Purposedifferent
When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.When systems fail unexpectedly, spontaneous attempts often produce more noise than insight. Hypothesis-driven Troubleshooting translates symptoms into testable assumptions and makes troubleshooting learnable.For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.In technical failures, the visible symptom often gets mixed up with the actual cause. Fault Isolation narrows the fault space and progressively reduces which part of the system is truly affected.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
60-90 min30-240 min30-90 min30-180 min
Participantsdifferent
4-101-61-61-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Problem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, ExperimentHypothesis Log, Test Plan, Evidence Notes, Diagnosis SummaryDecision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListFault Isolation Map, Test Log, Excluded Hypotheses, Narrowed Fault Area
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
TroubleshootingProblem solvingDiagnosis
DecisionTreeOptions
TroubleshootingDiagnosisEngineering
Add more methods