methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Paper illustration for Fault Isolation.
Engineering
Fault Isolation
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration for Hypothesis-Driven Troubleshooting.
Engineering
Hypothesis-Driven Troubleshooting
Purposedifferent
When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.In technical failures, the visible symptom often gets mixed up with the actual cause. Fault Isolation narrows the fault space and progressively reduces which part of the system is truly affected.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.When systems fail unexpectedly, spontaneous attempts often produce more noise than insight. Hypothesis-driven Troubleshooting translates symptoms into testable assumptions and makes troubleshooting learnable.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
60-90 min30-180 min1-2 h30-240 min
Participantsdifferent
4-101-64-121-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Problem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, ExperimentFault Isolation Map, Test Log, Excluded Hypotheses, Narrowed Fault AreaAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsHypothesis Log, Test Plan, Evidence Notes, Diagnosis Summary
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
TroubleshootingDiagnosisEngineering
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
TroubleshootingProblem solvingDiagnosis
Add more methods