View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Decision Framing Workshop |  Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |  Agile ROAM Board |  Growth A/B Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a decision is poorly framed, even good answers deliver little value. A Decision Framing Workshop sharpens the problem, goal, and boundaries before the actual weighing begins. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 45-60 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 2-8 | 3-15 | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Decision Frame, Decision Question, Criteria List, Evidence Plan | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | ROAM Board, Owner List | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary |
Tagsno overlap | Decision framingAlignmentCriteriaOptions | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation |