methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Decision Framing Workshop.
Decision Making
Decision Framing Workshop
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Architecture Inception Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Architecture Inception Canvas
Purposedifferent
When a decision is poorly framed, even good answers deliver little value. A Decision Framing Workshop sharpens the problem, goal, and boundaries before the actual weighing begins.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
60-120 min15-45 min1-2 Tage1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
4-101-31-43-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Decision Frame, Decision Question, Criteria List, Evidence PlanADR File, Decision Log, RationaleArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewInception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open Questions
Tagsno overlap
Decision framingAlignmentCriteriaOptions
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
AlignmentArchitectureCanvas
Add more methods