methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for DACI
Decision Making
DACI
Paper illustration for World Café.
Facilitation
World Café
Paper illustration for RAPID
Decision Making
RAPID
Paper illustration for Fishbowl Discussion.
Facilitation
Fishbowl Discussion
Purposedifferent
In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated.When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity.In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels.When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
30-60 min60-180 min45-90 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
2-1012-100+3-128-80
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
DACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision LogTable Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared QuestionsRAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision LogDiscussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions
Tagsno overlap
DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment
FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking
DecisionRolesGovernance
FacilitationDialogueLarge group
Add more methods