View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making DACI | ![]() UX Research User Interviews | ![]() Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated. | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 30–60 min per interview | 90-180 min | 30-60 min je Interview |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 1 participant per interview | 4-12 | 5-12 Interviews |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | DACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer |



