View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making DACI | ![]() Agile Planning Poker | ![]() Agile Affinity Estimation | ![]() Facilitation Delegation Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 2-5 min je Item | 30-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 3-9 | 3-12 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | DACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | AutonomyRolesTeam |



