View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making DACI |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 1-2 h | 60-120 min | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-10 | 4-12 | 5-12 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | DACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility |