View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Cynefin Workshop | ![]() Agile Specification by Example | ![]() Knowledge Modeling IBIS | ![]() Agile Example Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-180 min | 60-90 min pro Feature | 1-3 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-20 | 3-6 | 2-8 | 3-7 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Cynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking Notes | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | ComplexitySensemakingDecision | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | RationaleKnowledgeDecision | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement |



