methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing Customer Journey Canvas with its core stages and visible working result.
UX Design
Customer Journey Canvas
Process Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Operations
Process Mapping
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
A paper-based illustration representing Service Blueprint with its core stages and visible working result.
UX Design
Service Blueprinting
Purposedifferent
When a journey needs to be understood across several phases, it arranges experience, touchpoints, and opportunities into one picture. It makes gaps and friction along the user path clear.With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.When a service experience is spread across several touchpoints, it brings frontstage and backstage together. It shows where user contact and internal responsibility must fit.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowHigh
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-3 h30-120 min0.5-2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
3-103-102-66-12
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Customer Journey Canvas, Pain Points, Experience OpportunitiesProcess Map, Handoff List, Improvement BacklogObservation Notes, Improvement IdeasService Blueprint, Fail Points, Ownership Map
Tagsno overlap
JourneyCustomerService designCanvas
ProcessOperationsImprovement
LeanObservationProcessOperations
Service designOperationsJourneyBlueprint
Add more methods