View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Design Customer Journey Canvas |  Domain Modeling EventStorming |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |  Product Discovery Riskiest Assumption Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a journey needs to be understood across several phases, it arranges experience, touchpoints, and opportunities into one picture. It makes gaps and friction along the user path clear. | When a domain consists of many events, rules, and states, it creates a shared modeling space for the team. It bundles language, flows, and boundaries before domain knowledge fragments into siloed views. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | When an idea hinges on one critical unknown, it prioritizes testing that exact piece of uncertainty first. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritized list of assumptions, a test plan, and a result report. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 2-8 h | 1-5 Tage | 1-2 Wochen pro Iteration |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 5-12 | Nutzertraffic | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Customer Journey Canvas, Pain Points, Experience Opportunities | Event Timeline, Ubiquitous Language, Boundaries, Open Questions | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Prioritized Assumption List, Test Plan, Results Report |
Tagsno overlap | JourneyCustomerService designCanvas | Domain-Driven DesignEventsDiscoveryWorkshop | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryAssumptions |