View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Delivery Cost of Delay |  Innovation Design Sprint |  Product Discovery Solution Interview |  Product Strategy ICE Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list. |
Complexitydifferent | High | High | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 4-5 Tage | 30-60 min je Interview | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 5-8 | 5-10 Interviews | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | ICE Table, Top Idea List |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision |