View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Contradiction Analysis |  Facilitation Six Thinking Hats |  Operations Kepner-Tregoe |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a system should improve while another measure suffers as a result, the method makes the underlying conflict precisely formulable. It separates the desired effect from its side effect. This makes solutions possible that address the contradiction deliberately instead of half-heartedly. | When a topic gets stuck too quickly in the same thinking mode, Six Thinking Hats deliberately separates the perspectives. This means facts, risks, creativity, and emotional signals get worked through one after another instead of mixed together. | For a disturbance that's hard to pin down, the method cleanly separates problem, cause, and decision. It reduces mixing when symptoms allow several interpretations. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 45-90 min | 2-8 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 4-12 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Contradiction Statement, Abstraction Notes, Solution Principles, Concept Ideas | Perspective Notes, Decision Inputs, Action Items | Problem Analysis, Decision Analysis, Risk Plan |
Tagsno overlap | ContradictionsInnovationProblem solving | FacilitationOptionsDecision | Problem solvingRoot causeDecisionOperations |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
